| More information re: RFP's:
Again, wanting to be upbeat about the opportunity. We are framing
it as "our" conference. Of course we will have some noted
speakers and some of the "friends" but essentially we will
be spotlighting the knowledge and talent within the community. In
order to do that people need to step forward.
This is a great opportunity for seasoned and not so seasoned
practitioners. First time presenters are really encouraged to step
forward.
For the proposals, the initial evaluation will be based on the
following four categories:
- Content - value; is there enough to carry a session; is the info
too basic, etc.
- Relevance to the theme - does it fit high-speed, is it the
latest and greatest?
- Practical aspect - will participants take home tools,
techniques, etc.
- Type of proposal - briefing, poster, experiential (we don't want
to have all poster sessions, etc.)
The committee is approaching this will a lot of flexibility. If
someone has an idea that doesn't fit the current format, we'd like to
hear it. If it fits within the theme we will do whatever we can to
accommodate it. For example, Paula Communeli wants to do a session
that is 3 hours long. That doesn't fit but we've made an adjustment
for her because the session fits well within the theme and what we are
trying to accomplish.
The initial proposal does not have to be a work of art.
Essentially, we need enough info to evaluate it based on the criteria
above. Some people have sent in pages of info some have sent in a few
paragraphs. If they don't include something we need, we will go back
and ask for more. Once they are accepted, we will ask for more
detailed in (objectives, agenda, outline, etc.). Of course, we'd like
to have them all in place before the registration materials go out in
April. I hate to keep extending because people will typically take
whatever time we give them. I'd like to see as many as possible to us
by the 22nd.
|